The first of the month – rent is due…right? The Coronavirus has prompted some of the largest tenants, including Nordstrom and Barnes & Noble, to request rent relief or simply announce they were not going to pay rent. The Coronavirus has prompted many landlords and tenants to review their leases for options. Considerations include among other things: rent concessions, force majeure clauses, and outcomes in bankruptcy.
Whether by necessity (due to limited Court activity or eviction moratoriums) or a desire to collaborate on a solution, landlords and tenants are engaging in discussions outside of court to address rent payments due during a reduction in operations during the Coronavirus. According to media reports some tenants are requesting rent relief through the summer and others through the year. Below are some of the potential issues that would be discussed as part of an addendum, revised lease, or forbearance document:
Many leases include standard provisions that generally do not become an issue in litigation under normal circumstances. Force majeure clauses are one of those that clauses. Generally, the clause identifies specific events which excuse performance, such as acts of God, war, or labor disputes to name a few. Whether the coronavirus, pandemics generally, or the related government orders leading to closures or operation limitations trigger force majeure provisions is a subject of discussion and litigation. Under Florida law, determining whether performance is excused for force majeure depends on:
When a business files for Ch. 11 it generally receives breathing room from its past due debts through the automatic stay which pauses most collection activities. In a Ch. 11 case, businesses have the option to assume or reject leases as part of their reorganization efforts. Typically, the continuation of operations depends upon maintaining some physical presence and lease negotiations begin promptly to determine whether the lease will be assumed. One of the key provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, Section 365(d) requires, absent Court Order, the debtor in bankruptcy to timely pay rent rent and perform other obligations until the lease is assumed or rejected.
Recently, tenants in bankruptcy, including Modell’s Sporting Goods and Pier 1, have received Court Orders that allow them to defer rent payments during the closures. Recently, the Hair Cuttery’s parent company filed bankruptcy to request similar relief. Generally, bankruptcy courts are scheduling status conferences to evaluate the level of closures in the future given the revision of government orders on the issue. In Pier 1, the bankruptcy extended the period deferred rent through May at a recent hearing over substantial landlord opposition with continued monitoring to occur. In order to assume these leases and continue as a going concern the past due will have to be paid. These disputes are likely to playout across the country and will undoubtedly be watched by landlords and tenants alike as they evaluate options.
Crisis or not, it is a good idea to review lease documents from time to time. In many cases, certain lease provisions have not been revised years from tenant to tenant or lease to renewal. Fresh eyes and new experiences can guide landlords and tenants in future lease negotiations and lead to provisions that better understand the relationship.
Dialogue between landlords and tenants during this time will prove vital to both parties’ continued operations, litigation prospects, and whether bankruptcy is necessary.
The information provided on this website is for informational purposes only and is intended as a public service. Any questions of a legal nature should be directed to an attorney, and the information on this website is not intended to replace legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state. By using this website, you acknowledge that you may not rely upon or refer to the contents as being legal advice or guidance provided by BMU Law, without its prior written consent.